Gamez

United States v. Gamez

Good Law
232 F. App'x 651
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 3, 2007California327 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM ***

Armando Gamez appeals the judgment of conviction entered by the district court pursuant to a conditional plea agreement that retained his right to appeal the district court’s denial of his suppression motion. We affirm. Because the parties are familiar with the factual and procedural history of this case, we will not recount it here.

Assuming, without deciding, that Gamez had standing to assert the border patrol agents violated the Fourth Amendment in their search of an automobile driven by another person, we conclude that the district court properly denied the suppression motion. The totality of the circumstances supports the district court’s determination that the agents had reasonable suspicion to stop the vehicle. The vehicles were traveling in tandem in an area known for alien and drug smuggling, and the drivers engaged in evasive driving after they noticed the marked border patrol agent’s vehicles. The agents also noticed white covering draped over the top of the back seat, which he testified was similar to coverings used in previous cases to shield both aliens and drugs. The totality of the circumstances, including these factors, justified the stop of the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.