Jimenez
Jimenez v. Gonzales
232 F. App'x 714
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 18, 2007No. 04-71256California90 words
Lead Opinion
MEMORANDUM **
The immigration judge properly denied cancellation of removal because petitioners lack any qualifying relatives under 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b)(2)(A). Petitioners have cited no authority for their equal protection argument, and Fiallo v. Bell 1 and Ram v. INS 2 foreclose it.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
. Fiallo v. Bell, 430 U.S. 787, 794 , 97 S.Ct. 1473 , 52 L.Ed.2d 50 (1977).
. Ram v. INS, 243 F.3d 510, 517 (9th Cir.2001).