Raya

Raya v. Gonzales

Good Law
233 F. App'x 675
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 23, 2007No. 05-71027California308 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Jose Javier Cabrera Raya, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals affirming without opinion an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his motion to reopen deportation proceedings in which he was ordered deported in absentia. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252 , and review the denial of a motion to reopen for abuse of discretion. Cano-Merida v. INS, 311 F.3d 960, 964 (9th Cir.2002). We grant the petition for review and remand for further proceedings. •

We conclude that the IJ abused his discretion in denying Cabrera Raya’s motion to reopen because neither of the reasons given for denial is legally sufficient. The record does not support the IJ’s statement that Cabrera Raya was told the date of his hearing “twice on the record.” In addition, the IJ erred in describing Cabrera Raya’s motion as “7 years too late.” See Andia v. Ashcroft, 359 F.3d 1181, 1184 (9th Cir.2004) (per curiam) (“As there is no time limitation for motions to reopen in absentia orders based on lack of notice, the IJ could not create one as a matter of discretion.”). We decline to consider arguments made by the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.