Keefe
Washington State Bar Ass'n v. Keefe
Lead Opinion
MEMORANDUM **
John M. Keefe, Esq., appeals pro se from the district court’s order remanding to state court the disciplinary and disability proceedings brought against him by the *511 Washington State Bar Association. We dismiss the appeal.
We lack jurisdiction to review the district court’s remand order because that order was based on its determination, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1447 (c), that it lacked subject matter jurisdiction. See 28 U.S.C. § 1447 (d); United Investors Life Ins. Co. v. Waddell & Reed Inc., 360 F.3d 960, 963 (9th Cir.2004); see also Seedman v. U.S. Dist. Court for Cent. Dist. of California, 837 F.2d 413, 414 (9th Cir.1988) (per cu-riam) (prohibition on the review of remand orders extends to the district court’s own ability to entertain a motion for reconsideration).
DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provid *511 ed by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.