Throop

Throop v. Woodford

Good Law
234 F. App'x 535
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 12, 2007No. 07-55278California92 words

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Upon review of the record and appellant’s response to the May 15, 2007 order to show cause, we hereby summarily affirm the district court’s order denying appellant’s motion for preliminary injunctive relief without prejudice prior to service of the complaint. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (summary affirmance appropriate where result is clear from face of record). All pending motions are denied as moot.

AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.