Daghbashyan

Daghbashyan v. Gonzales

Good Law
234 F. App'x 637
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 14, 2007No. 05-76712California356 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Vardan Serob Daghbashyan, a native and citizen of Armenia, petitions for review of the denial of his application for asylum, withholding of removal and protection under the Convention Against Torture (CAT). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252 , and we deny the petition.

Where the BIA summarily affirms the decision of the IJ, we review the IJ’s decision as the final agency determination. Zehatye v. Gonzales, 453 F.3d 1182, 1184 (9th Cir.2006).

We review for substantial evidence the determination that a petitioner is ineligible for relief and will grant the petition only if the evidence compels a contrary conclusion. Id. at 1185 .

Substantial evidence supports the IJ’s conclusion that Daghbashyan has not shown past persecution or a well-founded fear of future persecution. The single detention and beating that Daghbashyan suffered in 1996 does not compel the conclusion that he suffered past persecution. See Gu v. Gonzales, 454 F.3d 1014 , 1019—20 (9th Cir.2006) (three-day detention and beating did not compel finding of past persecution). As to fear of future persecution, Daghbashyan failed to provide direct and specific evidence that the Armenian…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.