Torosyan

Torosyan v. Gonzales

Good Law
234 F. App'x 703
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 20, 2007No. 05-72008California299 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Petitioner Noel Torosyan, an Armenian native and citizen, seeks review of the decision by the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”). The BIA dismissed Toro-syan’s appeal from the Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) denial of his application for asylum and withholding of removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We deny the petition for review.

The BIA reviewed de novo the IJ’s conclusion that Torosyan failed to establish that he was persecuted on one of the five protected statutory grounds. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.1 (d)(3)(iii). “[O]ur review is limited to the BIA’s decision, except to the extent that the IJ’s opinion is expressly adopted.” Lin v. Gonzales, 472 F.3d 1131, 1133 (9th Cir.2007) (internal quotations omitted). We will grant the petition only if the evidence compels a contrary conclusion. See Zehatye v. Gonzales, 453 F.3d 1182, 1185 (9th Cir.2006).

Substantial evidence supports the BIA’s conclusion that Torosyan failed to establish by direct or circumstantial evidence that his persecutors were or would be motivated by one of the five protected statutory grounds. See 8 U.S.C. § 1158 (b)(1). Whatever abuses Torosyan suffered, he testified that the corrupt…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.