Gamityan

Gamityan v. Gonzales

Good Law
234 F. App'x 775
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 13, 2007No. 05-77071California248 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Hakob Gamityan, a native of Greece and citizen of Armenia, and his wife, Anush Sarafyan, a native and citizen of Armenia, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ affirmance of an Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) denial of their application for asylum, withholding of removal, and for relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review for substantial evidence, Chebchoub v. INS, 257 F.3d 1038, 1042 (9th Cir.2001), and grant the petition.

Substantial evidence does not support the IJ’s and BIA’s denial of asylum and withholding of removal based on an adverse credibility finding. Because the adverse credibility finding is based on minor inconsistencies which do not go to the heart of the matter, and an inconsistency which is not supported by the record, we grant petitioner’s asylum and withholding of removal claims. See Singh v. Gonzales, 439 F.3d 1100, 1105 (9th Cir.2006).

Petitioners’ CAT claim is waived because they failed to raise it in their opening brief. See Martinez-Serrano v. INS, 94 F.3d 1256, 1259-60 (9th Cir.1996).

Accordingly, we grant the petition with regard to the asylum and withholding…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.