Yoshikawa

Yoshikawa v. Securities & Exchange Commission

Good Law
235 F. App'x 475
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 25, 2007No. 05-75437California315 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM ***

Terrance Y. Yoshikawa petitions for review of an order of the Securities and Exchange Commission, which sustained a sanction imposed upon him and Ko Securities, Inc. (hereafter collectively ‘Yoshikawa”) by the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. (NASD) through its *476 National Adjudicatory Council (NAC). We deny the petition.

As relevant here, the sanction, which was imposed because Yoshikawa violated the NASD’s rules regarding short sales, 1 consisted of a fíne in the amount of Yoshikawa’s gains from the violation. Upon review of the record, we cannot say that under the circumstances the SEC abused its discretion when it sustained the disgorgement sanction imposed by the NASD, which had the effect of depriving Yoshikawa of the ill-gotten gains. See McNabb v. SEC, 298 F.3d 1126, 1133 (9th Cir.2002); Krull v. SEC, 248 F.3d 907, 911-12, 915 (9th Cir.2001); Hateley v. SEC, 8 F.3d 653, 655 (9th Cir.1993); In re Sweeney, 50 S.E.C. 761, 768, (1991); see also Saberi v. Commodity Futures Trading Comm’n, 488 F.3d 1207, 1215 (9th Cir.2007). That being so, we must deny the petition.

PETITION DENIED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.