Velasquez-Lagunas

United States v. Velasquez-Lagunas

Good Law
235 F. App'x 501
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 27, 2007No. 07-50001California215 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Appellant Palemón Velasquez-Lagunas appeals his sentence after pleading guilty to violating of 8 U.S.C. § 1326 , being a deported alien found in the United States. Appellant contends that his increased sen *502 tence, imposed pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1326 (b)(1), is unconstitutional.

We have reviewed the record and the opening brief and conclude that the questions raised in this appeal are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard). The United States Supreme Court’s decision in Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 247 , 118 S.Ct. 1219 , 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), remains binding on this court until the Court overrules it. See United States v. Weiland, 420 F.3d 1062 , 1079 n. 16 (9th Cir.2005) (noting that this court remains bound by the Supreme Court’s holding in Almendarez-Torres that a district court judge may enhance a sentence on the basis of prior convictions, even if the fact of those convictions was not found by a jury beyond a reasonable doubt).

Accordingly, the government’s motion for summary affirmance of the district court’s judgment is…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.