Garcia

Garcia v. Gonzales

Good Law
235 F. App'x 522
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 27, 2007No. 07-70728California316 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

We have reviewed the response to the court’s February 28, 2007 order to show cause and respondent’s motion to dismiss in part and for summary disposition in part.

With respect to petitioners Federico Palacios Garcia, A79-517-732, and Heladia Celia Garcia Juarez, A79-517-733, we conclude that petitioners have failed to raise a colorable constitutional or legal claim to invoke our jurisdiction over this petition for review. Accordingly, respondent’s motion to dismiss this petition for review for lack of jurisdiction as to petitioners Federico Palacios Garcia, and Heladia Celia Garcia Juarez, is granted. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (a)(2)(B)(i); Romero-Torres v. Ashcroft, 327 F.3d 887, 892 (9th Cir.2003); Montero-Martinez v. Ashcroft, 277 F.3d 1137, 1144 (9th Cir.2002).

Additionally, with respect to the motion for summary disposition as to the remaining petitioners: Ana Isabel Palacios Garcia, A79-517-734; Eduardo Palacios Garcia, A79-517-735; and Araceli Palacios Garcia, A79-517-736, a review of the administrative record demonstrates that petitioners have presented no evidence that they have a qualifying relative as defined in 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b)(l)(D). See Molina- *523…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.