Quiroz

United States v. Quiroz

Good Law
235 F. App'x 562
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 20, 2007No. 06-30588California118 words

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

James Andrew Quiroz appeals from his 87-month sentence imposed for possession with intent to distribute methamphetamine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841 . We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm.

Quiroz contends that he should have received a minor role adjustment pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2. We disagree. The district court did not clearly err in determining that Quiroz was not a minor participant in the drug distribution scheme because his co-conspirator’s statements support the district court’s determination. See United States v. Cantrell, 433 F.3d 1269, 1282-84 (9th Cir.2006).

AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.