Valladares-Puerto

United States v. Valladares-Puerto

Good Law
235 F. App'x 592
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 20, 2007No. 05-50810California263 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Jose Antonio Valladares-Puerto appeals from the 15-month sentence imposed following his guilty plea to being a deported alien found in the United States, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326 .

Valladares-Puerto contends that any reliance by the district court on a reinstatement of removal order for purposes of imposing a four-level upward adjustment in his offense level under U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(l)(D) violated his due process rights because the applicable regulations are ultra vires to the Attorney General’s legislative authority. We reject this contention. See also United States v. Luna-Madellaga, 315 F.3d 1224 (9th Cir.2003); see also United States v. Diaz-Luevano, No. 05-50129, 494 F.3d 1159, 1162-63 , 2007 WL 2044256 at *2-3 (9th Cir. July 18, 2007).

Valladares-Puerto further contends that the district court erred in sentencing him pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1326 (b) to more than the maximum set forth in 8 U.S.C. § 1326 (a). He also asserts that, in light of Shepard v. United States, 544 U.S. 13 , 125 S.Ct. 1254 , 161 L.Ed.2d 205 (2005), Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224 , 118 S.Ct. 1219 , 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), has been overruled and § 1326(b) is…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.