Waters

United States v. Waters

Good Law
235 F. App'x 602
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 21, 2007No. 06-10317California222 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Brian Dickie Waters appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 130-month sentence for distributing methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841 (a)(1) and (b)(l)(A)(vin). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 , 87 S.Ct. 1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Waters’ counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. No pro se supple *603 mental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Because our examination of the brief and independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 82-83 , 109 S.Ct. 346 , 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), reveals that Waters waived his right to appeal and was sentenced within the terms of the plea agreement, we enforce the waiver and dismiss the appeal. See United States v. Nguyen, 235 F.3d 1179, 1182 (9th Cir.2000); see also United States v. Cardenas, 405 F.3d 1046, 1048 (9th Cir.2005) (observing that changes in sentencing law imposed by United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 , 125 S.Ct. 738 , 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005), did not render waiver of appeal involuntary and unknowing).

Accordingly, we GRANT counsel’s motion to withdraw, and DISMISS the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.