Ramirez

Ramirez v. Gonzales

Good Law
235 F. App'x 612
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 21, 2007No. 05-75986California319 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Salvador Sandoval-Ramirez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ decision adopting and affirming an immigration judge’s denial of his application for cancellation of removal for failure to establish exceptional and extremely unusual hardship to his two United States citizen children and his lawful permanent resident parents. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We dismiss the petition for review.

*613 Pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (a)(2)(B)(i), we lack jurisdiction to review the discretionary determination that Sandoval-Ramirez failed to meet the hardship requirement of 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b)(l)(D). See Martinez-Rosas v. Gonzales, 424 F.3d 926, 929-30 (9th Cir.2005).

We have jurisdiction to consider color-able constitutional claims. Id. at 930 . Sandoval-Ramirez contends that the immigration judge violated his due process right to a full and fair hearing by refusing to consider the other requirements, beyond hardship, for cancellation of removal; by denying his request for a continuance so that his father could testify; and by failing to conduct an aggregate analysis of the hardship that would befall all…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.