Arana-Olivas
United States v. Arana-Olivas
235 F. App'x 629
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 22, 2007No. 06-50278California100 words
Lead Opinion
MEMORANDUM **
Efren Arana-Olivas appeals from the district court’s revocation of supervised release. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm.
Arana-Olivas’ challenge to the constitutionality of the supervised release sentencing scheme is foreclosed by this court’s decision in United States v. Huerta-Pi- *630 mental, 445 F.3d 1220, 1224-25 (9th Cir.2006) (explaining why supervised release sentencing scheme does not violate Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 , 120 S.Ct. 2348 , 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000)).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.