Delgado Ramirez v. Gonzales

Good Law
235 F. App'x 645
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 22, 2007No. 05-70167California371 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Luis Guillermo Delgado Ramirez, a native and citizen of Colombia, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals summarily affirming an Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) denial of his *646 application for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . Reviewing for substantial evidence, see Gu v. Gonzales, 454 F.3d 1014, 1018 (9th Cir.2006), we deny the petition in part, grant in part, and remand.

Delgado Ramirez relies on numerous incidents surrounding an ongoing dispute with the businesses across from his home and with the city government as evidence of past persecution. We are not persuaded. Substantial evidence supports the finding that any mistreatment Delgado Ramirez suffered was not based on a protected ground. See Ochave v. INS, 254 F.3d 859, 865-67 (9th Cir.2001) (requiring an alien to establish a nexus between alleged persecution and a protected ground).

Therefore, even assuming Delgado Ramirez was credible, substantial evidence supports the determination that he failed to present sufficient evidence to establish eligibility for asylum. See INS v.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.