Arcos-Valencia
Arcos-Valencia v. Gonzales
Opinion
Lead Opinion
MEMORANDUM **
Salvador Arcos-Valencia, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order adopting and affirming an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) removal order and denying his motion to remand to allow him to apply for adjustment of status. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . See Afridi v. Gonzales, 442 F.3d 1212, 1218 (9th Cir.2006). We review questions of law de novo. Id. at 1215 . We grant the petition for review, and remand.
The IJ denied Arcos-Valencia’s applications for a V visa, cancellation of removal, and voluntary departure, on the ground that Arcos-Valencia’s convictions barred him from establishing good moral character. Arcos-Valencia appealed the IJ’s decision to the BIA, and also moved to remand based on his new eligibility for adjustment of status. The BIA adopted and affirmed the IJ decision and denied remand on the ground that Arcos-Valencia was ineligible for adjustment of status under 8 U.S.C. § 1182 (a)(2)(D) (rendering aliens inadmissible for certain acts of prostitution and commercialized vice).
We remand to the BIA for reconsideration in light of our intervening decision in Kepilino v.…