Almodiel

Almodiel v. Gonzales

Good Law
238 F. App'x 315
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 19, 2007No. 06-70360California232 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Norma Almerol Almodiel, a native and citizen of the Philippines, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order adopting and affirming an Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) denial of her application for asylum, withholding of removal and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We deny the petition for review.

Even assuming that Almodiel is credible, substantial evidence supports the IJ’s and BIA’s determination that Almodiel did not demonstrate a well-founded fear of persecution because she was able to live in the Philippines, without harm or threats, for two years. See Lata v. INS, 204 F.3d 1241, 1245 (9th Cir.2000). Furthermore, Almodiel failed to show that it would be unreasonable for her to relocate within the Philippines. See 8 C.F.R. § 208.13 (b)(2)(ii); 8 C.F.R. § 208.13 (b)(3)(i).

Because Almodiel fails to establish eligibility for asylum, she necessarily fails to qualify for the higher standard under withholding of removal. See Singh v. INS, 134 F.3d 962, 971 (9th Cir.1998).

In her opening brief, Singh failed to address, and therefore has waived any challenge to, the IJ’s and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.