Hernandez

Hernandez v. Gonzales

Good Law
239 F. App'x 385
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 24, 2007No. 07-71296California274 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

This is a petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying petitioner’s motion to reopen removal proceedings and rescind the removal order entered in absentia.

The regulations provide that an in absentia order may be rescinded only “upon a motion to reopen filed within 180 days after the date of the order of removal if the alien demonstrates that the failure to appear was because of exceptional circumstances.” See 8 U.S.C. § 1229a(b)(5)(C). “The term ‘exceptional circumstances’ refers to exceptional circumstances (such as battery or extreme cruelty to the alien or any child or parent of the alien, serious illness of the alien, or serious illness or death of the spouse, child, or parent of the alien, but not including less compelling circumstances) beyond the control of the *386 alien.” See 8 U.S.C. § 1229a(e)(l). Therefore, the BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying petitioner’s motion to reopen when petitioner’s explanation for her absence did not include exceptional circumstances. See id.; Lara-Torres v. Ashcroft, 383 F.3d 968, 972 (9th Cir.2004).

Respondent’s motion for summary disposition is granted because the questions…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.