Roman-Rodriguez

United States v. Roman-Rodriguez

Good Law
240 F. App'x 765
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 16, 2007No. 06-30335California253 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Edgar Roman-Rodriguez appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 120-month sentence imposed for possession with intent to distribute methamphetamine and cocaine and illegal re-entry, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841 (a)(1) & (b)(1) and 8 U.S.C. § 1326 .

Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 , 87 S.Ct. 1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Roman-Rodriguez’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. The government filed an answer to the Anders brief on April 6, 2007. No pro se supplemental brief has been filed.

Because our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 82-83 , 109 S.Ct. 346 , 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), indicates that Roman-Rodriguez waived his right to appeal and was sentenced within the terms of the plea agreement, we enforce the waiver and dismiss the appeal. See United States v. Nguyen, 235 F.3d 1179, 1182 (9th Cir.2000).

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is granted.

In accordance with United States v. Rivera-Sanchez, 222 F.3d 1057, 1062 (9th Cir.2000), we remand the case to the district court with instructions that it delete from the judgment…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.