Anguiano-Hidalgo

Anguiano-Hidalgo v. Gonzales

Good Law
242 F. App'x 408
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 12, 2007No. 07-70539California438 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

This is a petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order summarily affirming the Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) denial of petitioners’ application for cancellation of removal pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b).

Respondent’s motion to dismiss this petition for review in part and for summary disposition in part is granted.

We have reviewed the response to the order to show cause and the opposition to the motion to dismiss this petition for review for lack of jurisdiction, and we conclude that petitioners have failed to raise a colorable constitutional or legal claim to invoke our jurisdiction over this petition for review because this court has upheld the constitutionality of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ streamlining procedures. See Falcon Carriche v. Ashcroft, 350 F.3d 845 (9th Cir.2003); Torres-Aguilar v. INS, *410 246 F.3d 1267, 1271 (9th Cir.2001). Accordingly, respondent’s motion to dismiss this petition for review in part for lack of jurisdiction as to petitioners Juan Anguiano-Hildalgo, Maria Sandra De La O Gallaga and Grisel Abigail Anguiano De La O is granted. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (a)(2)(B)(i); Romero-Torres v. Ashcroft, 327 F.3d 887,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.