Camero

Camero v. Gonzales

Good Law
242 F. App'x 428
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 13, 2007No. 05-76995California243 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Maria Crucifixa Bustos Camero and her two children, Kathy Dennis Salazar Bustos and Eber Jese Salazar Bustos, natives and citizens of Mexico, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing their appeal from the Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) order denying their motion to reopen proceedings based on ineffective assistance of counsel. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review the denial of a motion to reopen for abuse of discretion, and review claims of due process violations due to ineffective assistance of counsel de novo. See Mohammed v. Gonzales, 400 F.3d 785, 791-92 (9th Cir.2005). We grant the petition for review.

We disagree with the IJ and BIA that petitioners failed to demonstrate that their representative’s failure to timely perfect their appeal resulted in prejudice. See Rojas-Garcia v. Ashcroft, 339 F.3d 814, 826 (9th Cir.2003) (failure to file a timely appeal creates a rebuttable presumption of prejudice). Prior counsel’s untimely filing prejudiced Petitioners in that Petitioners lost the benefit of voluntary departure, and were barred from adjusting status for ten years. See id. at 827 ; see also 8…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.