Kahachatryan

Kahachatryan v. Keisler

Good Law
249 F. App'x 558
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 28, 2007No. 06-72172California292 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM ***

Margarit Kahachatryan, her husband, Gevorg Nersesyan, and children, Lilit Ner- *559 sesyan, Sona Nersesyan, and Varuzhan Nersesyan, all natives and citizens of Armenia, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) decision dismissing their appeal from an Immigration Judge’s denial of their application for asylum and withholding of removal, and request for relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review for substantial evidence and will uphold the BIA’s decision unless the evidence compels a contrary conclusion. INS v. Elias-Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478, 481, 483-84 , 112 S.Ct. 812 , 117 L.Ed.2d 38 (1992). We deny the petition.

Substantial evidence supports the BIA’s denial of petitioners’ asylum claim. The record does not compel the conclusion that any harm Kahachatryan suffered was on account of a political opinion, rather than as a result of the criminal actions of a few maverick government officials. See Grava v. INS, 205 F.3d 1177, 1181 (9th Cir.2000) (stating that the “salient question” is whether the petitioner’s opposition to corruption was “directed toward a governing institution, or…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.