Barragan-Juarez

Barragan-Juarez v. Keisler

Good Law
249 F. App'x 559
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 28, 2007No. 02-70030California239 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM ***

Simon Barragan-Juarez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order affirming without opinion an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his motion to reopen removal proceedings conducted in absentia. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review questions of law de novo. See Lin v. Gonzales, 473 F.3d 979, 981 (9th Cir.2007). We grant the petition for review and remand.

The IJ erred in concluding that Barra-gan-Juarez was ineligible to file a motion to reopen removal proceedings on the ground that he departed the United States after he was ordered removed in absentia. See id. at 982 (holding that 8 C.F.R. § 1003.23 (b)(1) does not preclude jurisdiction over motions to reopen filed by petitioners who had been lawfully removed after the completion of immigration proceedings and then reentered illegally).

The IJ also erred in determining that the original removal order was automatically reinstated upon Barragan-Juarez’s illegal reentry into the United States. See id. at 982-83 (noting that before the prior order can be reinstated, an immigration officer must comply with the requirements…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.