Khatchikian

Khatchikian v. Keisler

Good Law
249 F. App'x 572
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 28, 2007No. 05-71860California292 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM ***

Arsen Khatchikian, a native and citizen of Armenia, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order adopting and affirming an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his motion to reopen deportation proceedings. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review questions of law de novo. See Lin v. Gonzales, 473 F.3d 979, 981 (9th Cir.2007). We dismiss in part and grant in part the petition for review and remand.

As a preliminary matter, we reject the government’s contention that Khatchikian has waived any challenge to the agency’s denial of his motion to reopen. See Singh v. Ashcroft, 361 F.3d 1152 , 1157 n. 3 (9th Cir.2004). The agency erred in concluding that Khatchikian was ineligible to file a motion to reopen deportation proceedings on the ground that he departed the United States after he was ordered deported in absentia. See Lin, 473 F.3d at 982 (holding that 8 C.F.R. § 1003.23 (b)(1) does not preclude jurisdiction over motions to reopen filed by petitioners who had been lawfully deported after the completion of immigration proceedings and then reentered illegally). Accordingly, we remand to the BIA with instructions to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.