Guzeyev

Guzeyev v. Keisler

Good Law
249 F. App'x 599
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 1, 2007No. 05-75852California234 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM ***

Alexander Guzeyev, a native and citizen of Russia, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ decision affirming the Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) denial of his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review for substantial evidence, Singh-Kaur v. INS, 183 F.3d 1147, 1149 (9th Cir.1999), and we deny the petition.

Substantial evidence supports the IJ’s adverse credibility determination because Guzeyev’s testimony was vague regarding the nature of his religious denomination. See id. at 1153 . In addition, Guzeyev failed to mention the fact that he was beaten while detained by the government. See Li v. Ashcroft, 378 F.3d 959, 962-63 (9th Cir.2004).

*600 Because Guzeyev failed to satisfy the lower standard of proof for asylum, it necessarily follows that he failed to satisfy the more stringent standard for withholding of removal. See Farah v. Ashcroft, 348 F.3d 1153, 1156 (9th Cir.2003).

Because Guzeyev’s CAT claim is based on the same testimony that the IJ found not credible, and because he points to no other evidence that the IJ should…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.