Phillips

Phillips v. Keisler

Good Law
249 F. App'x 621
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 1, 2007Nos. 04-70570, 04-73750California196 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM ***

John Phillips petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (BIA) dismissal of his appeal of an immigration judge’s (IJ) denial of his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture. Phillips also petitions for review of the BIA’s denial of his motion to reopen. This court consolidated Phillips’ petitions. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (b)(6). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (a)(1) and we deny Phillips’ petitions.

The BIA adopted the IJ’s adverse credibility determination in denying Phillips’ petitions and substantial evidence supports the IJ’s adverse credibility determination as well as the BIA’s determination that Phillips failed to establish eligibility for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture. See Singh-Kaur v. INS, 183 F.3d 1147, 1151-53 (9th Cir.1999).

The BIA acted within its discretion when it denied Phillips’ motion to reopen because the new evidence Phillips sought to introduce did not undermine the IJ’s adverse credibility determination or otherwise corroborate his claim. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2 (c)(1) (2003).

PETITION DENIED.

xhiS…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.