American Isuzu Motors, Inc. v. Fladeboe Volkswagen, Inc.

Good Law
250 F. App'x 204
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 27, 2007No. 05-56943California923 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Fladeboe Volkswagen, Inc., (FVW) appeals from a judgment in favor of American Isuzu Motors, Inc., (Isuzu) for trademark infringement and related statutory based torts. We have jurisdiction. 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . FVW claims that the district court erred in granting motions in limine precluding it from offering evidence in support of an affirmative defense. The parties are aware of the facts which need not be repeated here except to the extent necessary to explain our ruling.

Ray Fladeboe (Fladeboe) was the principal shareholder of Ray Fladeboe Lincoln Mercury (RFLM). RFLM, operating d/b/a Fladeboe Isuzu, held a dealership with Isuzu to sell Isuzu vehicíes and use Isuzu’s trademarks. For reasons unrelated to this appeal Fladeboe decided to dissolve RFLM and spin off its various dealerships. Fladeboe intended to transfer the Isuzu dealership to a corporation he had established, FVW. State law and the franchise agreement precluded Fladeboe from transferring the Isuzu dealership to FVW without Isuzu’s consent, but provided that consent should not be unreasonably withheld. Isuzu provisionally approved FVW as a dealer and offered Fladeboe a contract which Fladeboe felt was…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.