Westine

Westine v. United States Probation Department

Good Law
250 F. App'x 813
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 10, 2007No. 06-56404California230 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

The motion to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The Clerk shall amend the docket to reflect this status.

Appellant John G. Westine, Jr. appeals from the district court’s order denying his request to file a petition for writ of mandamus, dated July 7, 2006, without prepayment of the filing fee. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We review the district court’s denial for abuse of discretion, see, e.g., Minetti v. Port of Seattle, 152 F.3d 1113, 1114 (9th Cir.1998), and we vacate and remand.

The district court denied appellant’s motion to file without prepayment of the filing fee for three reasons: (1) inadequate showing of indigency; (2) failure to authorize disbursements from prison trust account to pay filing fee; and (3) failure to provide certified copy of trust fund statement for the prior six months, apparently applying the requirements of 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (a)(2) to the application. However, because appellant’s petition sought to vacate as void ab initio a criminal judgment entered against appellant, the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (a)(2) do not apply.

Accordingly, we vacate and remand for the district court to allow appellant to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.