Pangelinan

United States v. Pangelinan

Good Law
250 F. App'x 826
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 11, 2007No. 07-10032California307 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM ***

John S. Pangelinan appeals his jury conviction of two counts of obstruction of a court order, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1509 , arising out of his use of threats to interfere with a court order. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , reverse Pangelinan’s conviction on Count 1, but otherwise affirm. Because the facts and procedural history are familiar to the parties, we repeat them here only as necessary.

First, the evidence was insufficient to support Pangelinan’s conviction under § 1509 on Count 1. Pangelinan’s June 1, 2006, letter contains no language which any rational trier of fact could reasonably find expressed or implied a threat of physical or unlawful harm to person or property. United, States v. Stewart, 420 F.3d 1007, 1016-17 (9th Cir.2005). We therefore REVERSE Pangelinan’s conviction on Count 1. The evidence, however, is sufficient to affirm Pangelinan’s conviction on Count 2. Pangelinan’s June 19, 2006, letter contains language which a rational trier of fact could find expressed a threat of physical harm to person or property. Id.

We reject each of Pangelinan’s remaining claims. The district court’s taking judicial notice of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.