Robles-Diaz

Robles-Diaz v. Keisler

Good Law
256 F. App'x 26
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 18, 2007No. 05-73379California310 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

ORDER

The memorandum disposition filed on March 16, 2007 is hereby withdrawn and replaced by a concurrently filed memorandum disposition.

MEMORANDUM ***

Carlos Antonio Robles-Diaz, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision to deny his motion to reopen deportation proceedings. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252 , and review the denial of a motion to reopen for abuse of discretion. Konstantinova v. INS, 195 F.3d 528, 529 (9th Cir.1999). We grant the petition for review in part, dismiss it in part, and remand for further proceedings.

Robles-Diaz contends that the agency should have assessed his motion to reopen on the merits, because it was filed after the five-year bar to his adjustment of status contained in former § 242B(e)(l) of the Immigration and Nationality Act had expired. The BIA, in applying Matter of MS-, 22 I. & N. Dec. 349 (BIA 1998) (en banc), to Robles-Diaz’s case, did not address any effect this statutory provision may have on the subsequently enacted 90-day deadline for motions to reopen in 8 C.F.R. § 1003.23 (b)(1). We…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.