Nickel

Nickel v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n

Good Law
256 F. App'x 957
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 27, 2007No. 06-15593California417 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Paul Merritt Christiansen appeals pro se the district court’s order approving the distribution of unclaimed settlement funds to charity in a diversity class action *958 against Bank of America. Christiansen does not contest the distribution to charity, but argues that the class members should be reimbursed the legal fees previously paid as a percentage of the unclaimed settlement funds. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm.

The Appellees assert that this appeal is untimely because the final orders Christiansen seeks to challenge were issued in May 2004 and his Notice of Appeal was not filed until March 21, 2006. This argument would have merit had the earlier orders stated definitively that unclaimed funds would be distributed to charity. To the contrary, the Reserve Clause contained two possible outcomes: distribution to the class or distribution to charity. It was not until January 9, 2006, that the district court determined that the funds would go to charity and not to the class. Shortly thereafter, Christiansen filed a formal objection that was denied in a February 27, 2006, district court order. This order was the first final appealable…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.