United States v. Williams
Opinion
Lead Opinion
MEMORANDUM **
Chi’istopher Brandon Williams appeals the denial of his motion to suppress a gun found on his person when Las Vegas police officers forcibly detained him on suspicion of walking down a city street and firing a gun at cars. He contends that the record below does not support the district court’s conclusion that there was probable cause to arrest him for “minor traffic violations.” He also argues that the district court violated Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 12(d) by failing to specify which traffic codes barred Williams from walking down the middle of the street. Neither argument has merit.
The Nevada traffic code states that:
N.R.S. § 484.331. This provision plainly requires a pedestrian to walk on the sidewalks or, if there are no sidewalks, along the left side of the road. The district court’s finding that Williams walked “down *16 the middle of the street” is sufficient to support its conclusion Williams had probably violated traffic laws.
Nor does the district court’s failure to cite N.R.S. § 484.331 require a remand under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 12(d). Whether walking “down the middle of the street” is a traffic violation in Nevada is a…