Singh

MEMORANDUM ***

Joginder Singh petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) dismissal of his appeal of the Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) denial of his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). 1 We lack jurisdiction to review the IJ’s determination that Singh is statutorily ineligible for asylum based on the one-year time bar. See 8 U.S.C. § 1158 (a)(2)(B); Ramadan v. Gonzales, 479 F.3d 646, 650 (9th Cir.2007) (per curiam). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 over Singh’s remaining claims. See Shire v. Ashcroft, 388 F.3d 1288, 1294 (9th Cir.2004). Because the BIA incorporated portions of the IJ’s conclusions, we review both the BIA’s and IJ’s decisions. See Kalubi v. Ashcroft, 364 F.3d 1134 , 1137 n. 3 (9th Cir.2004). We review for substantial evidence the BIA’s and IJ’s adverse credibility determinations, Cordon-Garcia v. INS, 204 F.3d *954 985, 990 (9th Cir.2000), and we deny the petition.

Substantial evidence supports the BIA’s and IJ’s adverse credibility determinations based on Singh’s inconsistent, implausible, and imprecise testimony. See Singh v. Ashcroft, 367 F.3d 1139, 1143 (9th…