Azatyan

Azatyan v. Mukasey

Good Law
258 F. App'x 994
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 14, 2007No. 05-77307California397 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Aregnaz Azatyan, a native and citizen of Armenia,, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals adopting and affirming an Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) denial of her applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . Reviewing for substantial evidence, we deny the petition for review. See Gui v. INS, 280 F.3d 1217, 1225 (9th Cir.2002).

Substantial evidence supports the IJ’s *995 denial of relief. 1 The IJ’s adverse credibility finding was based on the numerous and significant discrepancies among Azatyan’s entry interview, credible fear interview, asylum application, and hearing testimony. See Chebchoub v. INS, 257 F.3d 1038, 1042-45 (9th Cir.2001). Moreover, the IJ’s demeanor finding is supported by substantial evidence, as it was based on the fact that Azatyan was able to answer expected questions in a straightforward manner, but began to mutter and speak at an inaudible level when asked to recount an accurate sequence of events. See Paredes-Urrestarazu v. INS, 36 F.3d 801, 818 (9th Cir.1994). Finally, the relevant State Department Country…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.