Saunders

Saunders v. Harsco Corp.

Good Law
262 F. App'x 6
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 26, 2007No. 06-15383California414 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Appellant Steven Saunders instituted this negligence action against Appellee Harsco Corporation. The district court granted summary judgment for Harsco based on its conclusion that Harsco was statutorily immune from liability under the Nevada Industrial Insurance Act (“NIIA”). Nev.Rev.Stat. § 616B.612(1). We vacate and remand.

The Nevada Supreme Court recently clarified that where NIIA immunity is claimed, the threshold question is whether the injury arose out of “a project executed within the scope of a [Nevada] licensed contractor’s license.” Richards v. Republic Silver State Disposal, Inc., 148 P.3d 684, 689 (Nev.2006). If the principal contractor is not so licensed, then the inquiry becomes whether the principal and subcontractor are in “the same trade, business, profession or occupation.” Nev.Rev.Stat. .§ 616B.603(l)(b); Richards, 148 P.3d at 688 . Under Meers, the question is whether the work performed by the subcontractor is something that is “normally” done by the principal’s employees in the course of its regular business. Meers v. Haughton Elevator, 101 Nev. 283 , 701 P.2d 1006, 1007 (1985); Tucker v. Action Equip. & Scaffold Co., 113 Nev. 1349 , 951 P.2d…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.