Ren

Ren v. Mukasey

Good Law
262 F. App'x 806
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 3, 2008No. 05-71349California304 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Jun Ren, a native and citizen of China, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) decision dismissing his appeal from an Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) denial of his application for asylum and withholding of removal, and request for relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We deny the petition.

The record does not compel the conclusion that Ren’s untimely filing of his asylum application should be excused. See 8 C.F.R. § 208.4 (a)(5).

We review for substantial evidence the IJ’s and BIA’s denial of Ren’s withholding of removal claim on the basis on an adverse credibility finding. Malhi v. INS, 336 F.3d 989, 992 (9th Cir.2003).

Substantial evidence supports the IJ’s and BIA’s denial of the withholding of removal claim based on an adverse credibility determination. Ren testified inconsistently with the testimony he gave at the asylum interview regarding whether he was arrested and harmed in China, and regarding significant details of the harm he allegedly suffered. See Pal v. INS, 204 F.3d 935, 940 (9th Cir.2000).

Ren’s CAT claim also fails because it is based on the same testimony that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.