Pena-Velasquez

United States v. Pena-Velasquez

Good Law
265 F. App'x 569
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 24, 2008No. 07-30055California205 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Antonio Pena-Velasquez appeals from the 365-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute methamphetamine, possession with intent to distribute methamphetamine, and being found in the United States following a previous deportation, all in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326 ; 18 U.S.C. § 2 ; 21 U.S.C. §§ 841 (a)(1), (b)(1)(A), (b)(1)(B); and 21 *570 U.S.C. § 846 . We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm.

Pena-Velasquez contends that his sentence is unreasonable because it will keep him incarcerated until he is 72 years old, and is therefore greater than necessary to accomplish the goals stated in 18 U.S.C. § 3553 (a). We disagree. The district court carefully considered Pena-Velasquez’s history and circumstances, addressed the statutory factors specified in 18 U.S.C. § 3553 (a), and properly calculated the applicable range under the advisory Sentencing Guidelines, before imposing a sentence at the top of the Guidelines range. We conclude that the sentence is not unreasonable. See Gall v. United States, -U.S. -, 128 S.Ct. 586, 602 , 169 L.Ed.2d 445 (2007).

AFFIRMED.

This…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.