Calderon

Calderon v. Mukasey

Good Law
265 F. App'x 607
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 28, 2008No. 05-77323California349 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Jose Rolando Calderon, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ decision summarily affirming an Immigration Judge’s (“U”) denial of his application for asylum and withholding of removal, and request for relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review for substantial evidence and will uphold the IJ’s decision unless the evidence compels a contrary conclusion. INS v. Elias-Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478, 481, 483-84 , 112 S.Ct. 812 , 117 L.Ed.2d 38 (1992). We deny the petition.

Substantial evidence supports the IJ’s denial of asylum because Calderon only described incidents of generalized violence, and provided no evidence that he or members of his family were singled out for persecution in the past or would be in the future based on an imputed political opinion. See Ochave v. INS, 254 F.3d 859, 865 *608 (9th Cir.2001) (“Asylum generally is not available to victims of civil strife, unless they are singled out on account of a protected ground.”).

Because Calderon failed to establish eligibility for asylum, he necessarily failed to meet the more stringent…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.