Velandia

Velandia v. Mukasey

Good Law
265 F. App'x 614
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 28, 2008No. 06-70063California275 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Lead petitioner Efrain Santamaría Velandia, his wife, Jeanne Esther Diaz Mejia, *615 and two children, Vanessa Santamaría Diaz and Christian Camilo Santamaría Diaz (collectively “petitioner”), all natives and citizens of Colombia, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order that adopted and affirmed an Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) order denying their claims for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We deny the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the IJ’s determination that petitioner failed to establish past persecution or a well-founded fear of future persecution on account of either an imputed political opinion or membership in a particular social group. See Cruz-Navarro v. INS, 232 F.3d 1024, 1030 (9th Cir.2000); Chanco v. INS, 82 F.3d 298, 303 (9th Cir.1996); see also Njuguna v. Ashcroft, 374 F.3d 765, 770 (9th Cir.2004). Further, we conclude that petitioner’s fear of future persecution is speculative. See Nagoulko v. INS, 333 F.3d 1012, 1018 (9th Cir.2003). Thus, petitioner’s asylum claim fails.

Because petitioner failed to meet the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.