Velandia
Velandia v. Mukasey
Opinion
lead Opinion
MEMORANDUM **
Lead petitioner Efrain Santamaría Velandia, his wife, Jeanne Esther Diaz Mejia, *615 and two children, Vanessa Santamaría Diaz and Christian Camilo Santamaría Diaz (collectively “petitioner”), all natives and citizens of Colombia, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order that adopted and affirmed an Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) order denying their claims for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We deny the petition for review.
Substantial evidence supports the IJ’s determination that petitioner failed to establish past persecution or a well-founded fear of future persecution on account of either an imputed political opinion or membership in a particular social group. See Cruz-Navarro v. INS, 232 F.3d 1024, 1030 (9th Cir.2000); Chanco v. INS, 82 F.3d 298, 303 (9th Cir.1996); see also Njuguna v. Ashcroft, 374 F.3d 765, 770 (9th Cir.2004). Further, we conclude that petitioner’s fear of future persecution is speculative. See Nagoulko v. INS, 333 F.3d 1012, 1018 (9th Cir.2003). Thus, petitioner’s asylum claim fails.