Miles

United States v. Miles

Good Law
266 F. App'x 534
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 24, 2008No. 07-10127California263 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Miles appeals from his sentence of eighty-seven months imprisonment and three years supervised release. He challenges the district court’s determination that his two previous felony convictions under Ohio Revised Code § 2925.03 qualified as controlled substance offenses under section 4B1.2(b) of the United States Sentencing Guidelines (Guidelines). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3742 (a) and 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm.

*536 The district court properly considered Miles’s plea transcripts to determine which section of the Ohio Revised Code § 2925.03 formed the basis for his convictions. See Taylor v. United States, 495 U.S. 575, 602 , 110 S.Ct. 2143 , 109 L.Ed.2d 607 (1990). The district court then correctly held that his convictions under section (A)(2) of the statute qualified categorically as controlled substance offenses under the Guidelines.

The “reasonable cause to believe” language from the Ohio statute only relates to the defendant’s knowledge of a third-party’s intent to sell (not the case here), and does not impermissibly lower the standard of intent necessary for conviction to ship, transport, deliver, etc. Similarly, the fact that the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.