Salerno

Salerno v. Astrue

Good Law
266 F. App'x 570
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 5, 2008No. 06-15418California1,455 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM ***

Charles Salerno (“Salerno”) appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment to the Commissioner of Social Secu *572 rity (“Commissioner”) affirming the denial of Salerno’s application for disability insurance benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1381 et seq., and the district court’s denial of his Rule 59(e) motion to alter or amend the judgment.

Salerno, a 69-year-old former poultry warehouse material handler and foreman, alleged disability stemming from eye strain, lower back pain, joint and leg pain, varicose veins, locking fingers, shortness of breath, short-term memory loss, ringing in his ears, depression, trouble sleeping, indigestion, and diarrhea. The Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) found Salerno does not suffer from a listed disability, calculated Salerno’s residual functional capacity, and determined Salerno could not perform his past work, but found Salerno had skills transferable to other less physically demanding work. Salerno sought review in the district court pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405 (g). The district court granted summary judgment to the Commissioner and then denied Salerno’s Rule 59(e) motion to alter or…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.