Majors

MEMORANDUM **

1. For the reasons given by the district court, the California Court of Appeal did not unreasonably apply Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307, 319 , 99 S.Ct. 2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979), when it affirmed Majors’s conviction. See Juan H. v. Allen, 408 F.3d 1262, 1274-75 (9th Cir.2005).

2. Because Majors had an opportunity to litigate his Fourth Amendment claim in the state courts, we cannot grant habeas relief on that basis. See Ortiz-Sandoval v. Gomez, 81 F.3d 891, 899 (9th Cir.1996).

AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.