Lopez

Lopez v. Mukasey

Good Law
267 F. App'x 506
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 10, 2008No. 07-73618California233 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

The motion to proceed in forma pauperis is granted.

*507 Benito Perez Lopez and Maria Remedios Rodriguez petition for review of a Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) decision denying their motion to reopen as untimely and number-barred.

The Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) did not abuse its discretion in denying petitioners’ motion to reopen because it was Benito Perez Lopez’s second motion to reopen, and was untimely as to Maria Remedios Rodriguez. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2 (c)(2), (3); Rodriguez-Lariz v. INS, 282 F.3d 1218, 1222 (9th Cir.2002).

Accordingly, respondent’s unopposed motion for summary disposition is granted in part because the questions raised by this petition for review are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982).

To the extent petitioners challenge the BIA’s decision not to exercise its discretionary authority to reopen sua sponte, this court lacks jurisdiction to consider that claim. See Ekimian v. INS, 303 F.3d 1153, 1158-59 (9th Cir.2002). Accordingly, the petition for review is dismissed in part.

Ml other pending motions are denied as moot. The temporary stay of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.