Herrera

Herrera v. Mukasey

Good Law
267 F. App'x 529
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 15, 2008No. 07-74134California328 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

This is a petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order adopting and affirming an Immigration Judge’s order denying petitioners’ application for cancellation of removal.

A review of the administrative record demonstrates that petitioners, Jose Alfredo Ramirez Gutierrez (A 96-061-119) and Maria Magdalena Ramirez Gutierrez (A 96-061-120), have presented no evidence that they have a qualifying relative as defined in 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b)(l)(D). See Molina-Estrada v. INS, 293 F.3d 1089, 1093-94 (9th Cir.2002). The BIA therefore correctly concluded that, as a matter of law, petitioners Jose Alfredo Ramirez Gutierrez and Maria Magdalena Ramirez Gutierrez were ineligible for cancellation of removal. Accordingly, the petition for review is summarily denied in part because the questions raised by this petition for review are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam).

With respect to the adult petitioners, Leopoldo Ramirez Herrera (A 96-061-117) and Catalina Ramirez Gutierrez (A 96-061-118), we have reviewed the response to the court’s November 1, 2007 order to show…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.

Herrera · Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals · 2008 | Caselegis