Caballero De Martinez v. Mukasey

Good Law
268 F. App'x 679
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 7, 2008No. 04-76566California260 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Nora Lissette Caballero de Martinez, and her children Linduara Isabel, Fredy *680 Armando, and Sinthia Dahena, are natives and citizens of Honduras. They petition pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing their appeal for lack of jurisdiction on the ground that they waived their right to appeal in exchange for a grant of administrative voluntary departure. We review questions of jurisdiction de novo. See Barron v. Ashcroft, 358 F.3d 674, 677 (9th Cir.2004). We grant the petition for review and remand.

We conclude that the issue of whether petitioners’ waiver of appeal was knowing and intelligent was properly before the BIA, and should have been addressed by the agency. In their notice of appeal to the BIA, petitioners exhausted the issue by contending that the proceeding was not translated into their native Spanish and that they did not understand the consequences of the decision. See Ladha v. INS, 215 F.3d 889, 903 (9th Cir.2000) (holding that issues raised in a notice of appeal are properly exhausted); see also Sembiring v. Gonzales, 499 F.3d 981, 990 (9th Cir.2007) (“It is a long-established principle that the submissions of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.