22:I[98912,["/_next/static/chunks/0asocxi83kb~5.js","/_next/static/chunks/0n4z.7yu76je-.js","/_next/static/chunks/0eyt_ou8dj52g.js","/_next/static/chunks/01bcia3bjqt9z.js","/_next/static/chunks/15egrlmmf_yst.js"],"CaseDetailGate"] 23:T494,MEMORANDUM ** Jose Garcia-Flores appeals from the 77-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for illegal reentry of a removed alien, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326 . We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm. Garcia-Flores contends that the district court erred by refusing to consider at sentencing the fact that he had rejected a fast-track plea agreement with a 51-month sentence. He further contends that, as a result, the district court was unable to consider whether there was an unwarranted disparity between his sentence and those imposed on similarly-situated defendants in the same federal district who accepted fast-track plea agreements. We conclude that the district court did not commit procedural error and that Garcia-Flores’ sentence is reasonable. See Gall v. United States, — U.S. -, 128 S.Ct. 586, 598-600 , 169 L.Ed.2d 445 (2007); see also United States v. Marcial-Santiago, 447 F.3d 715, 718-19 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 127 S.Ct. 309 , 166 L.Ed.2d 232 (2006). AFFIRMED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.24:T4af,

MEMORANDUM **

Jose Garcia-Flores appeals from the 77-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for illegal reentry of a removed alien, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326 . We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm.

Garcia-Flores contends that the district court erred by refusing to consider at sentencing the fact that he had rejected a fast-track plea agreement with a 51-month sentence. He further contends that, as a result, the district court was unable to consider whether there was an unwarranted disparity between his sentence and those imposed on similarly-situated defendants in the same federal district who accepted fast-track plea agreements. We conclude that the district court did not commit procedural error and that Garcia-Flores’ sentence is reasonable. See Gall v. United States, — U.S. -, 128 S.Ct. 586, 598-600 , 169 L.Ed.2d 445 (2007); see also United States v. Marcial-Santiago, 447 F.3d 715, 718-19 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 127 S.Ct. 309 , 166 L.Ed.2d 232 (2006).

AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.