Vargas-Aguirre

United States v. Vargas-Aguirre

Good Law
270 F. App'x 534
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 14, 2008No. 07-10216California270 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Jose Vargas-Aguirre (“Vargas”) appeals his conviction and sentence for attempted illegal reentry after deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326 . We affirm.

The district court properly denied Vargas’s motion to dismiss the indictment and his motion for acquittal. There was sufficient evidence he had attempted to reenter the United States free from official restraint by presenting an Arizona driver’s license and attempting to convince a border patrol officer he was a United States citizen. It was not legally impossible for him to commit the crime; if his ploy had been successful, he would have been free to proceed without further government involvement. Moreover, we have previously affirmed a conviction for attempted reentry in similar circumstances. See United States v. Gracidas-Ulibarry, 231 F.3d 1188, 1197 (9th Cir.2000) (en banc) (failure to instruct on specific intent harmless because of overwhelming evidence that alien, who attempted to cross the border at a checkpoint by lying about his citizenship, had attempted to reenter the country in violation of § 1326).

Vargas’s sixty-three month sentence was within the correctly-computed guideline *535 range. Rita…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.