United States v. Johnson

Good Law
270 F. App'x 637
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 19, 2008No. 07-30137California340 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

The United States appeals the district court’s grant of Christopher Lee Johnson’s motion to suppress evidence garnered when his probation officer (and five other officers) conducted a search of his residence. We affirm.

When Johnson was placed on probation, he accepted the State of Montana’s required conditions. Those conditions limited his right to be free from intrusions into his residence; they provided for searches of his residence upon reasonable suspicion, and for home visits “as required per policy.” 1 The Government now concedes that the entry into the residence to conduct a search was not upon reasonable suspicion, but it argues that the entry was a home visit. However, the Government did not present evidence to carry its burden of persuasion 2 on the question of whether this was a home visit as required per policy. 3 Yet that is the only kind of home visit that Montana provides for. The Government’s failure to support its home visit claim is fatal to its position.

AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

. No doubt those restrictions were permitted under the Fourth…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.